Friday, March 30, 2012

Barcelona in flames: General Strike!


Tiros y barricadas en el centro de Barcelona

Las calles de la ciudad viven momentos de caos después de la manifestación de la huelga general. Mossos y manifestantes violentos han protagonizado una batalla campal. - Sílvia Colomé / Albert Domènech

The General Strike of 29 March paralyzed much of Spain. The ports shut down, along with many factories, electricity consumption fell by 24% (even though in Madrid, for example, they kept the street lights running during the day to jack up the usage rates and affect the statistics), transport in many areas was paralyzed, strike participation ran between 80-100% in most industries (and at about a quarter to a third in the service sector and the small shops).

In Barcelona, the general strike began at midnight with pickets closing down bars. In the center, one group of hooded picketers entered a casino, presumably to shut it down, but once inside they carried out a quick robbery and made off with 2,300 euros in cash. Early in the morning, at least 8 blockades, most of them involving burning tires, shut down the major highway and rail entrances to the city. Pickets throughout the morning in most neighborhoods of the city patrolled the streets, blocking transit, barricading the streets with dumpsters, and forcing shops to close. At midday the strike in Barcelona escalated into heavy rioting that lasted most of the day. Hundreds of thousands of people converged in the city center, seizing the streets and slowing down police. Innumerable banks and luxury stores were smashed, innumerable dumpsters set ablaze, and a large number of banks, luxury stores, Starbucks and other chains were set on fire. In a couple occasions the police were sent running, attacked with fire, fireworks, and stones, and for the first time ever the Catalan police had to use tear gas to regain control, although large parts of the city remained liberated for hours, and columns of smoke rose into the sky from multiple neighborhoods late into the night. Many journalists and undercover cops were attacked and injured by the rioters. Fires spread to unseen proportions, often filling wide avenues and sending flames shooting several meters into the air. Firefighters were so over extended, they often took half an hour to reach even the major blazes, and were often seen bypassing burning dumpsters in order to extinguish burning banks. Dozens of people were injured by less lethal ammunitions fired by the police, and a relatively unprecedented number of people participated in the riots directly or indirectly. The heaviest fighting and smashing was carried out by anarchists, left Catalan independentistes, socialists, and above all neighborhood hooligans and immigrant youth. Nonetheless, thousands more people of all ages and backgrounds supported and applauded the rioters and filled the air with anticapitalist chants. Accounts and memories differ, but many people feel that they have just witnessed the largest and most important riots in Catalunya since the 1980s, if not earlier.

A more detailed report will follow when the smoke clears.

Some interesting videos are linked below, but bear in mind that the most intense moments are never recorded, because the journalists are getting their cameras smashed, and also because generally the government requests that the media not show footage of large groups of people smashing banks or attacking the police.





Thursday, March 29, 2012

Fascist Ordinance upheld by pigs




Deputies B. Brawner, left, and J. Larson arrest an unidentified woman after she reportedly put a banner back on the fence, violat­ing the county’s new ordinance re­stricting protesting in front of the Humboldt County Courthouse in Eureka on Wednesday afternoon. After warnings and copies of the ordinance were given out, and a deadline of 4 p.m. for removing banners and signs from the fence was set, sheriff’s deputies took them down, officials said. The ac­tivists no longer have a tarp shel­ter on the site and moved almost all of their items onto the sidewalk, which is city property.

Arcata woman sues city, police over potless pot search; suit alleges unlawful search, rough treatment hastened husband's death

Thadeus Greenson/The Times-Standard
Posted: 03/29/2012 02:38:29 AM PDT

A 64-year-old Arcata woman filed a lawsuit Wednesday alleging that the city and its police officers violated the rights of her and her late husband when they searched their home last year looking for marijuana.
The lawsuit -- filed by Barbara Sage and seeking unspecified damages -- argues that officers acted on an unlawful warrant, used excessive force and didn't announce their intentions when they entered the Sages' Arcata home on May 27, 2011, looking for evidence of illegal marijuana cultivation that they never found.
More interesting to medical marijuana advocates is Barbara Sage's argument that police didn't have sufficient probable cause for the search because they failed to present any evidence that the Sages' suspected marijuana cultivation fell outside the bounds of state and local medical marijuana laws and regulations.
Arcata City Attorney Nancy Diamond and other city officials either didn't respond to calls seeking comment for this story or declined to comment, saying they hadn't seen a copy of the complaint as of Wednesday.
When previously contacted by the Times-Standard, local officials declined to specifically comment on the search of the Sages' home -- when she opened her door to an officer disguised as a utility meter reader only to have about a dozen officers enter her home with guns drawn -- but said police act in a good faith attempt to target individuals who are in flagrant violation of Proposition 215 and Arcata's medical marijuana ordinance.
They noted that most violators act under the auspices of medical marijuana and that the hazy state of California's laws make enforcement a complicated endeavor.
Barbara Sage's attorneys, Peter Martin and Jeffrey Schwartz, argue that she and her husband did everything asked of them. They hired an electrician to come in and rewire their garage, making sure it was done to code. They grew only for themselves, according to the attorneys, making sure their indoor garden was within the confines of Arcata's medical marijuana land use ordinance, which allows for grows of up to 50 square feet that utilize no more than 1,200 watts per residence.
”She is the quintessential medical marijuana patient,” Schwartz said of Sage.
In a previous interview, Barbara Sage said she uses medical marijuana to treat hip pain and help with her insomnia, while her late husband used it to help treat prostate cancer and other ailments. She said the couple never sold their marijuana, not even to a collective.
The search warrant served on the Sages' home stemmed from an affidavit in support of a search warrant filed by Arcata Police Officer Brian Hoffman -- who is specifically named as a defendant in the suit -- asserting that there was probable cause to believe the Sages were committing a felony.
Acting on a tip from an unnamed “state park employee” who reported that he commonly smelled growing marijuana coming from the Sages' residence, Hoffman stated that he went down to the Sages' Zehndner Avenue home and smelled a “strong odor of growing marijuana emanating from the residence” on May 1.
Hoffman states in the affidavit that he then got a search warrant for Pacific Gas and Electric Co. records, which indicated the household's electrical usage ranged from 2,796 kilowatt hours to 5,362 kilowatt hours in each of the three prior months.
The officer submitted the affidavit -- which was signed off on by Humboldt County Deputy District Attorney Max Cardoza -- and received a search warrant signed by Judge Dale Reinholtsen the same day.
When officers served the search warrant about two weeks later, they found no marijuana -- growing or processed -- and Sage claims no marijuana had been in her residence since May 5, 2011.
Sage's complaint argues that Hoffman and his fellow officers took no steps to investigate whether the Sages' grow fell within the guidelines of Arcata's medical marijuana ordinance and had no facts to suggest a felony was being committed.
Dale Gieringer, California coordinator for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, said state medical marijuana laws only offer what's called “a limited immunity from prosecution,” meaning prosecutors shouldn't bring a case against someone unless they have solid evidence that it is not for medicinal purposes. That limited immunity currently doesn't apply to search warrants under most interpretations of the law.
Nonetheless, Gieringer said he understands the argument Schwartz and Martin are making.
”I understand where they're trying to go with it, but nobody's taken the law this far,” he said.
Schwartz said he realizes this, and thinks the case may ultimately be decided by a higher court and could potentially shift the landscape of state medical marijuana law. Schwartz said he hopes the suit is successful locally, but said he is fully prepared to move the case up the chain if a judge throws it out locally.
”This is Humboldt County,” Schwartz said. “We should be the ones taking the lead on this. Nobody else is doing it, and we get more of these cases than most counties.”
University of California Hastings associate professor of law Hadar Aviram previously told the Times-Standard that she thinks Sage's claim is an interesting one that highlights the hazy world of California's medical marijuana law.
Aviram said she sees both sides of the argument. You have patients on the one hand who are doing everything by the book but could still see a parade of police barge into their house. On the other, you have police trying to enforce a law that has so much gray area the only answer is to go into someone's home and see what they find.
”It all comes down to how much do we expect the police to verify the situation before they walk in,” she said, “and I see good arguments on both sides.”
Aside from the probable cause issue, Sage argues that police violated the “knock-notice” rule, which requires them to announce their presence and that they are serving a warrant when entering someone's home, and that Hoffman failed to include a statement of expertise and qualifications to support the warrant. Further, Sage claims officers used unnecessary force when they came into her home with guns drawn, allegedly pulled her sick husband from bed -- tearing oxygen tubes from his nose -- and put him on the ground in handcuffs.
”This rough treatment affected his mood drastically, and he went into a state of depression after the search that hastened his death,” the suit states.
Speaking generally, and not about the Sage case, Arcata Police Chief Tom Chapman said he and his officers have no interest in going after legitimate medical marijuana patients. He said the department relies heavily on PG&E records when investigating suspected grow houses, noting a strong relationship between electricity consumption rates and grow sizes. Chapman added that there's no such thing as a “legal” grow in California, noting that state medical marijuana laws only offer a “defense for a crime.”
Schwartz indicated he'd like to see Sage's complaint change that, lending medical marijuana patients the same privacy rights as other citizens. However, Schwartz said, Sage would have been happy not to bring the suit if the district attorney's office or local law enforcement had agreed to require that search warrants rely on evidence that marijuana grows fall outside of medicinal bounds before issuing them. Schwartz said those conversations had little traction, so Sage is suing in an effort to make sure no other legitimate patients wind up in the situation she did -- with police guns pointed at them as officers search their homes.
Schwartz and Martin said the suit specifically names Hoffman in an effort to show that the officers who sign their names on affidavits in support of search warrants can and will be held personally liable.
”Our primary goal at this point is to let law enforcement in Humboldt County know that their days of having a free pass are over,” Martin said.
On the web:
Watch a video of officers entering the Sages' home
Thadeus Greenson can be reached at 441-0509 or tgreenson@times-standard.com.

get ready for a General Strike May 1

By Jesse D. Palmer

The call for a global general strike beginning on May 1 is exciting and with luck, millions of people will rise up and shut down the economy -- but we need to make sure any general strike has a strong foundation, moves our struggle in a positive direction and addresses regular people who aren't already active within the occupy scene. Calling a general strike -- in which everyone in every industry and job is asked to risk their livelihood by walking out -- is a dramatic act. If successful, it would mean stores and factories would close, transport would cease to function, and day-to-day commerce would grind to a halt.

There is a risk that those calling for the strike are being romantic and impractical -- getting ahead of themselves. Most of the hundreds of occupations around the country are just in the beginning stages of the long, difficult process of building social connections to large numbers of regular people in the community -- a necessary pre-requisite for effectively pulling off a general strike. While building an effective general strike is a major long-shot, it is not entirely impossible given the powerful social contradictions disclosed by the occupy movement, which the mainstream political and economic system is incapable of addressing.

Some of the calls for action circulating as Slingshot goes to press that try to explain why there should be a general strike need additional thought and work. For example, the call to action issued by Occupy LA reads, in part, "The goal is to shut down commerce worldwide and show the 1% we will not be taken for granted, we will not be silenced, WE WILL NOT MOVE until our grievances are redressed."

Now is not the time to reduce the beauty of the occupy phenomenon to protesting-as-usual in which we organize events for the sake of organizing them -- without really believing our own rhetoric or aiming to succeed -- or in which we beg our rulers to redress grievances for us. This concedes that those in power are legitimate and have a right to retain their power. Why should we beg them for crumbs rather than uniting to topple them?

We have to ask whether we really want any of the things those in power can give us? The reason so many of us occupied across the country is that the political and economic systems are broken. Our votes, our job searches, our compliance with bureaucratic rules, our passive acceptance of corrupt power structures -- none of it got us anywhere. Within the occupation, we dismissed our faith in the failed system and instead built our own solidarity, community and power to begin to redefine what is important in the world and destroy the structures of power that stop us from living the lives we really want.

In a redefined world, the capitalists, the bankers, their politicians and the whole modern power structure will be as irrelevant and ridiculous as the kings, serfs and slavery of 200 years ago seem to us now.

Occupy is, fundamentally, about class struggle. The wealth gap between the majority of people who work for a living and the tiny fraction who skim off most of the money by virtue of owning stuff, not by working, has reached a breaking point. Anything the rulers own was created by us -- those who work. Yet decades of propaganda have sold many people on the idea that we need the rich as "job creators" and that if they get richer, their wealth will eventually "trickle down" to those below.

The first phase of the occupy movement has been about gathering strength, recognizing our numbers, grasping community, and liberating a wide-ranging critical discussion of the existing power structure. The crucial role of opening up dialog cannot be overstated. It is hard to remember how unfashionable and difficult it was to talk about class inequality and economic injustice just a few months ago. Slogans like "we are the 99%" articulated something everyone knew, yet few wanted to openly discuss. We have to start by killing the businessman in our heads.

But as powerful as standing up against gross economic inequality felt last fall, the occupy movement can't succeed by just being against things. We are for a new kind of world and while part of it is about money and a fair distribution of wealth, our real power comes from something deeper. Being for something new brings us creative, courageous, passionate juices that arise from love. That is one reason why our occupations felt so meaningful -- we were building a community and creating libraries, kids villages, medic tents, general assemblies, rather than just being against something.

The key to a new world is not just re-distributing money in a more reasonable fashion. Rather, the key is exposing the big lie behind the corporate rat-race that the 1% are pushing -- that our lives are mostly about money and things and that a pay increase or a fatter bank account will give us satisfaction. Capitalism requires constant economic expansion, which means the system has to constantly psychologically manipulate us to want more, buy more and work more. The list of material goods and services that defined a "good life" in 1950 would be considered poverty in 2012. And the things we want now won't seem like enough in another ten years, unless somehow we step off the hamster wheel.

In developed economies like the US, we're way past the point where more stuff improves our lives. The typical suburban house keeps getting bigger, cars and electronics keep getting more sophisticated and super stores are stuffed with products. Many people are always seeking the next new thing or experience but when they get there, it always feels somehow empty. The system expands by transforming things we once did for ourselves, our families or our communities into services provided by industry -- entertainment, cooking, grooming, healthcare, childcare. The economic machine expands voraciously, addressing its own needs for growth rather than human needs for freedom, connection and engagement.

Psychologically, many of us suffer fallout from these economic imperatives and assume that bigger is always better, leading us to try to improve the size and scale of our protests and actions, rather than concentrating on the quality of our actions. So if an occupation or protest is good, the next action has to always be bigger, more disruptive, louder.

The most important aspect of the early days of the occupy movement was not size, per se, although it was important that the moment spoke to people and that a lot of people plugged in. Rather, the novel thing was the way we felt at the occupation -- the amazing sense of engagement, agency, community and dialog.

Those days and those experiences were so powerful to so many of us that now, our attempts to re-create those feelings may paradoxically make it more difficult for us to move forward. Feeling so good is like crack -- we want that feeling back. But you cannot organize the surge of excitement that was present at the birth of the occupations -- it happened because conditions were right and we were lucky enough to be there to experience it. That doesn't mean we can't keep things moving, but there is a danger in trying to simplistically re-create the particular tactics or symbols of particular moments rather than staying aware of the mood now and letting that be our guide as tactics change and evolve.

Calling a global general strike can be a reasonable tactic to respond to social conditions, but for it to be relevant it has to be part of an integrated struggle -- it has to evolve organically from our lives and our communities. It has to be big but also deep, touching grassroots and hearts. We have to go beyond making big actions for their own sake if by doing so the exercise feels alienating or meaningless. To avoid that, we have to figure out how our actions will keep us present, build community, encourage critical thinking, create dialog, while discrediting and de-legitimizing the system. How can we point out the absurdity of a system where a handful of people control everything because of a few numbers on a computer screen? Billionaires and their fortunes are the modern equivalent of the divine right of kings.

Engaging and changing minds is way more crucial than providing "colorful visuals" for media consumers. Our actions have to avoid becoming just another part of the modern media spectacle -- we are not faceless numbers at a protest. How can we avoid getting distracted by traditional traps -- endless ritualized struggles with the police or boring engagements with election year politics -- and instead focus on creating an alternative narrative outside of the currently available categories? To keep the scene moving in a positive direction, we have to focus on as big a picture as we can conceive and bring up ideas not currently on the table.

While autonomous action has been a key strength of the occupy movement, and the original Wall Street occupation came out of an autonomous call from Adbusters magazine rather than consultation with the community, we may now be suffering from too much of a good thing as many occupations, organizations and individuals all simultaneously call ambitious, sometimes national actions like the multiple, simultaneous calls for a general strike. There is a fine line between an autonomous action and an adventurist action. It is probably impossible to get a good balance between autonomous action and actions designed by committee that, after going through too many general assemblies and quasi-bureaucratic hoops, become mushy, watered down exercises that appeal only to the lowest common denominator. Still, we can think about the tension and try.

As Slingshot goes to press, there are three months left to build a national general strike. That's not long for a traditional gradual organizing campaign, but an eternity for a wildfire or an idea whose time has come. Resistance can easily take off if it tastes delicious in everyone's mouth. This has to go far beyond the relatively small pockets that occupied last fall, and that only will happen if we keep our mind on the quality of the process and the feeling of engagement and participation. We can make the general strike if we do it for ourselves and the world we are creating and if we do it with love in our hearts.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

HUMBOLDT GRASSROOTS INFOSHOP AND LENDING LIBRARY

The Humboldt Grassroots infoshop/library has open hours! Come check us out, upstairs at the Ink Annex (formerly e2), 47b West 3rd St.

Mondays from 4-7
Tuesdays from 12-8
Wednesdays from 4-7
Thursdays from 11-2:30
Fridays from 12-4

Come get yourself a fucking rad Slingshot Organizer for the year of 2012. It's halfway through the year so prices have dropped dramatically by half!

3$ for the smalls/6$ for the large.

Super amazing hip calendar organizer with tons of tiny bits of info to remind you of the amazing history of radicals throughout history. Not to mention we've got great books for sale on behalf of Black Cat/ThoughtCrime!, Crimethinc. Ex-workers collective, as well as many other distributors.
http://slingshot.tao.ca/organizer.php

Newest surveillance technology can search up to 36 millions faces in 1 second

While the same task would typically require manually sifting through hours upon hours of recordings, the company´s new technology searches algorithmically for a facial match. It enables any organization, from a retail outlet to the government, to monitor and identify pedestrians or customers from a database of faces.


Hitachi’s software is able to recognize a face with up to 30 degrees of deviation turned vertically and horizontally away from the camera, and requires faces to fill at least 40 pixels by 40 pixels for accurate recognition. Any image, whether captured on a mobile phone, handheld camera, or a video still, can be uploaded and searched against its database for matches.


“This high speed is achieved by detecting faces through image recognition when the footage from the camera is recorded, and also by grouping similar faces,” Seiichi Hirai, Hitachi Kokusai Electric researcher told DigInfo TV.

If a department store shoplifter is caught on camera, the suspected individual’s image can be isolated and Hitachi’s software will sift through its database to look for prior visits to that store. From there, it can generate clips of all the other footage the suspect appears in. These could allow authorities or shop owners to peruse the suspect’s actions before and during the incident, potentially generating more clues that could identify him or her.


“We think this system is suitable for customers that have a relatively large-scale surveillance system, such as railways, power companies, law enforcement, and large stores,” Hirai added.


While the system could obviously prevent or catch suspicious activity; we can think of a couple of uses outside of its immediate purpose. For instance, the system could be employed as a tool to find lost children within crowded events, like concerts or in amusement parks. Other uses might be more contentious. An upgraded iteration of the system could enable corporations or governmental organizations to track down individuals who owe unpaid fines. That may be an extreme hypothetical, but the technology would make it possible. Now it´s up to legislators and regulators to decide how far is too far.


Hitachi Kokusai Electric´s surveillance camera system will launch in the next fiscal year.


This article was originally posted on Digital Trends

More from Digital Trends

Take a virtual vacation with Google Street View in the Amazon rain forest and Thailand


Meet Permoveh, the new single-person vehicle that reinvents the wheel

TacoCopter to use flying drones to deliver your tacos (possibly)

Get inside CERN: ALICE with these shots from Antonio Saba

QUEER ULTRA VIOLENCE: BASH BACK! Book out!

“A mob of gay terrorists”

-Bill O’Reilly

The editors of the new book "Queer Ultra Violence: Bash Back! anthology" will be stopping in Phoenix on Monday March 12 to host a discussion on "Queer Resistance in the Age of Austerity." The event kicks off at 7 PM and will be held at the Phoenix Infoshop, located at 1206 E. McKinley in central Phoenix.
A Presentation by Tegan Eanelli and Fray Baroque; editors of "Queer Ultra Violence: Bash Back! Anthology"

Queer Ultra Violence: Bash Back! Anthology published by Ardent Press, is an analytical anthology that chronicles the (non)organization and militant queer tendency known as Bash Back! Although short lived, Bash Back! had an astonishing impact on both radical and queer organizing in the United States. Bash Back! took on gay assimilation, anti-queer violence, the queer radical establishment, and capitalism with a queer struggle that rejected traditional identity politics. The anthology complies essays, interviews, and communiqués to document the new queer tendency spawned bythe Bash Back! years.

As capitalism and the state are thrown into deeper and deeper crisis, queers and all others historically excluded from both formal economies and from the safety net of the nuclear family, will bear the brunt of the age of austerity. Reflecting critically on the past several years of radical queer action and imagination, the editors of Bash Back! Queer Ultraviolence will attempt to navigate queer space and potential in a world torn by crisis. Through this talk, Eanelli and Baroque will present a series of proposals for action and survival, taking as their starting point the position of queer autonomy and queer revolt against the State and Capital. This lecture will theorize queer gangs, self-defense networks, occupations, communes and a praxis of vengeance.

We highly recommend that all interested people attend this event, and if this is the first you're hearing of Bash Back!, you can check out some of the links below to get familiar:

Bash Back! MKE Statement About Pridefest and Nazi Confrontation
A collection of Bash Back! videos
Reflections on the Demise of Bash Back!
Selections from the Introduction and Conclusion to Queer Ultra Violence
Rowdy Queers Trash and Glamdalize Human Rights Campaign Giftshop in Washington, DC on the 42nd Anniversary of the Stone Wall Riots


A classic flier calling for the BB! convergences on the national political conventions







Key FARC leaders among Colombia casualties in bombing raid

Colombian authorities say eight key rebel leaders were among the 36 killed during a Colombian army operation in a remote jungle region on Monday.

Monday's raid against the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) in central Colombia marked the second blow to the drug-funded group in less than a week.

"This shows that our armed forces continue their offensive and are not going to stop," President Juan Manuel Santos said during a meeting of security officials in the provincial city of Villavicencio.

The dawn attack in the province of Meta brought the total number of FARC rebels killed by the armed forces to 69 after an attack last Wednesday killed 33 rebels who were resting in the northern plains region of Arauca.

The operations form part of a new military strategy to fight the nation's largest rebel group by destroying their key armed and financial units, marking a shift from the previous focus of tracking down and killing their leaders.

Billions of dollars in US military aid have helped Colombia lead a military offensive that has killed off top leaders of the group and pushed them further into isolated mountain and jungle regions.

Still formidable

The FARC's fighting force has dropped by close to half to about 8,000 in the past decade and many of the group's key
commanders and founding members are dead.

The new strategy focuses on using intelligence to track down specific battle units and choke off their sources of financing, which include drug trafficking, illegal metals mining and extortion.

The group said last month it would abandon its decades-long policy of kidnapping for ransom and free military and police
hostages it holds in jungle camps.

The liberation is expected to begin at the start of April.

But the FARC, Latin America's longest-running rebel group, remains a formidable force and continues to attack towns and oil installations in efforts to weaken industries such as mining and energy that have helped Colombia's economy grow.



As the biggest irregular guerrilla army in Colombia, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia - FARC) operates in different regions of the country mainly in search for financial sources to fight their 40-year old war against the government and maintain their army. The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia - FARC) is the oldest and most important guerrilla group in Western Hemisphere. It has long financed its political and military battle against the Colombian government by kidnapping, extortion and participating on various levels in the drug trafficking business.

In spite of a concerted effort by the Colombian government, that included close to $8 billion in U.S. assistance over the last ten years, the rebel group still operates in 25 of 32 Colombian departments. Throughout the decades, the FARC has frequently adapted its tactics to survive, from its 1982 decision to begin taxing coca growers and cocaine laboratories, to its failed attempt at establishing a political party, the Patriotic Union (Unión Patriotica), in 1984. More recently, following the death in 2008 of its longtime spiritual and military commander, Pedro Antonio Marín, alias 'Manuel Marulanda,' the rebel group has begun moving towards building up its urban networks and increasing its political outreach, after the military defeats suffered during Álvaro Uribe’s presidency (2002-2010).

Origins

The FARC’s roots can be traced back to the rural violence that afflicted Colombia, following the assassination of populist leader of the Liberal Party, Jorge Eliécer Gaitán, on April 9, 1948, in Bogota. The assassination touched off a sectarian struggle, first in Bogota, and later in the countryside. The fight began as a battle between the country’s two chief parties, the Liberals and Conservatives. Entire villages were targeted for their political affiliations, among them the village of Ceilán, in the Valle del Cauca department, where the Liberal Party recruited young men like Pedro Antonio Marín, then alias 'Tirofijo,' to fight off the Conservative paramilitary onslaught. The violence, or what became known as 'La Violencia,' would leave close to 200,000 dead during the next 15 years. Hundreds of thousands more fled their hometowns to larger cities or more remote rural areas.

Depleted Guerrilla Forces in Colombia

Among those who fled was a small faction under the control of the Communist Party of Colombia (Partido Comunista de Colombia - PCC). These colonists survived during their marches by organizing militias, or what were known as “self-defense” (autodefensas) units. The PCC 'autodefensas' were part of a larger Colombian communist strategy of “combining all forms of struggle,” which also included developing unions, student organizations and vying for political posts. The PCC’s unity and strategy attracted some members of the Liberal Party’s militias, among them Marín, who joined the party some time in the 1950s. The PCC’s rural factions were tiny but represented an ideological threat to the government, which launched an offensive against them in 1964 in their stronghold, the village of Marquetalia, Tolima. The offensive cleared the rebels out but provided the spark for the party to formalize its armed group: the Southern Tolima Bloc (Bloque Sur de Tolima).

The rebel group adopted the name Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia - FARC) in 1966, and began a slow, steady rise. The growth of the illegal drug market helped. In the mid-1970s, the guerrillas changed their bylaws and began collecting taxes from the numerous marijuana growers in the south of the country. They later expanded that mandate to include the coca leaf plantations. During that same period the FARC began kidnapping en masse and extorting large and small businesses. In the early 1980s, the FARC began taxing cocaine laboratories that operated in their areas of influence.

The new revenue meant better equipment and more troops, but it also came with a very high cost. Large cocaine traffickers began balking at the “taxes”; they also bought land and began to exert influence on local politics. When leftist rebels from another guerrilla faction kidnapped the daughter of a large drug trafficking organization, several traffickers organized a paramilitary organization, Death to Kidnappers (Muerte a Secuestradores - MAS). Fighting between drug traffickers and the FARC also started over an alleged theft by the rebels of a large stash of cash in the Eastern Plains. Farmers, businessmen, and small shop owners also turned on the rebels because of the excessive extortion and kidnapping.

In 1984, the FARC tried another tactic and launched a political party while negotiating a peace settlement with the government. The Patriotic Union (Unión Patriotica - UP) was small but gained momentum as the country shifted to more local government control of funds and projects. In its first elections in 1986, the UP won several seats in congress and its presidential candidate garnered over 300,000 votes, a record for a leftist candidate. In the country’s first municipal elections in 1988, the party won 16 mayoral campaigns and another 247 city council posts. The reaction by the party’s opposition was swift. Paramilitary groups and drug traffickers, at times working closely with the Colombian government, assassinated UP members en masse. Over 3,000 were killed in a six-year period, and the FARC returned to the mountains where it continued its meteoric rise.

Indeed, the guerrillas’ growth during this period caused concern, and many questioned the FARC’s intentions vis-à-vis the UP, wondering whether the rebels had used the party as a means to strengthen itself militarily even while it negotiated peace and talked about turning in its weapons. Between 1984-1988, the years that the UP was the strongest, the FARC doubled the size of its forces. This growth was due to many factors, among them the attacks on the UP itself, which pushed many to give up on the democratic process, and the FARC’s strategy, which drew from the PCC’s idea of “combining all forms of struggle.”

The 1990s continued apace. After the government launched an aerial assault on the guerrillas’ headquarters in 1991, the FARC began spreading its forces throughout the countryside and developed more offensive tactics. In the mid-1990s, the rebels perpetrated a series of spectacular and debilitating assaults on government troops and battalions, leading the capture of hundreds of Colombian troops and policemen who quickly became bargaining chips in a new round of negotiations between the government and the FARC. Not long after a prisoner swap between the sides, the government ceded a massive territory in the southern provinces of Caquetá and Meta the size of Switzerland that opened the door to more peace talks.

The talks, however, were in trouble from the start when Marín, who had since taken on the former formal nom de guerre of Manuel Marulanda, did not appear at the inauguration. The years that followed included some advances but mostly difficulties. The FARC used the territory to regroup, recruit, train and launch attacks on nearby towns. When the army would give chase, the rebels would retreat into the zone. The FARC also kept kidnapping victims in the region and oversaw large coca plantations, the raw material used to make cocaine. In what many saw as the rebels’ real intentions, they built roads and tunnels, as if preparing for the type of prolonged war that Mao-tse-tung had used in China or the Vietcong had used in Vietnam.

In 2002, the talks ended when the FARC hijacked an airplane and landed it along a highway, before taking several passengers captive. Fighting broke out immediately as the government sought to retake the Switzerland-sized swath of land it had ceded for the negotiations. Shortly thereafter, the guerrillas kidnapped Green Party Presidential Candidate Íngrid Betancourt and her vice-presidential running mate, Clara Rojas. In February 2003, an airplane carrying four US government contractors and a Colombian pilot who were doing surveillance over the FARC-controlled region in the south crashed. Three of the U.S. contractors were taken captive.

These events coincided with the arrival of President Álvaro Uribe in 2002, who, as opposed to his predecessor Andrés Pastrana, had campaigned on a war platform. The FARC greeted him by launching mortars at the presidential palace during the August 7, 2002, inauguration.

Undeterred, Uribe reinforced the army, strengthened police intelligence, placed security forces in nearly every municipality and created incentive programs for the rebels to turn themselves into authorities. This effort got a boost from the US, which had begun an ambitious assistance program it had labeled “Plan Colombia,” in 2000. Following the kidnapping of the three US contractors, the US intelligence services upped their training, equipment and assistance to the Colombians, accelerating an already fast-track professionalization program.

The results have been historic and have had a powerful cumulative effect that has transformed Colombia. Thousands of guerrillas have voluntarily demobilized, weakening the FARC and strengthening the state’s intelligence on the rebels. In September 2007, in what was perhaps the first big blow against the group, the Colombian Air Force bombed a FARC camp in eastern department of Guaviare, killing the rebel leader Tomás Medina Caracas, alias 'Negro Acacio.' In March 2008, the government bombed a FARC camp located near the Putumayo river, a couple of kilometers inside Ecuador, killing Luis Edgar Devia Silva, alias 'Raul Reyes' and several other guerrillas. That same month, Manuel Marulanda died of natural causes. The new leadership of the FARC, Guillermo León Sáenz Vargas, alias 'Alfonso Cano,' and Víctor Julio Suárez, alias'Mono Jojoy,' had been trying to implement a new strategy, but government forces’ constant offensives have strangled these two leaders. Suárez was killed in September 2010, and several other FARC leaders have taken refuge in Venezuela and other neighboring states.

Still, the FARC is not finished. The rebel group has several thousand troops and continues to draw strength from government economic policies that have widened the divide between rich and poor in this country. The FARC also still operates in coca-growing areas, from which it can draw tremendous revenue and even dabble in the trade of the processed-cocaine itself, which the guerrillas are increasingly doing.

Modus Operandi

The FARC is a complex group with a well defined organizational structure and line of command. It's organizational structure has evolved throughout the years as a result of a process of adaptation to the main challenges of the internal conflict. Ostensibly hierarchical, the geography and size of Colombia has made it nearly impossible for the central command, known as the Secretariat, to exercise control over the pieces, which are broken up into Fronts, with the exception of various special forces units that tend to roam where they are most needed or where they are doing a special operation. In the cities, the FARC manages militia groups. Throughout they have a vast support network full of logistical experts in bombing, transportation, kidnapping, arms trafficking, food storage, etc. The relative autonomy of the Fronts can make them lethal criminal organizations. Indeed, the Fronts, of which there are over 70, have incentive to thieve, kidnap, extort and plunder since their growth depends, in part, on their financial return.

On the political front, the FARC is connected to the Communist Party of Colombia (Partido Comunista de Colombia - PCC). Each unit has a political operative and each soldier has political as well as military duties. These include paying attention to and analyzing the daily news and spreading the gospel of the FARC to family and friends. For all intents and purposes, the FARC has broken from the PCC and, after their public political project, the UP, failed, they are running two clandestine structures, the Bolivarian Movement and the Clandestine Communist Party of Colombia.

In the end, there is much discussion about whether this structure and modus operandi constitute a 'cartel' or a criminal organization. While it is true that parts of the FARC traffic in illegal drugs in increasing quantities, kidnap and extort, and partake in other criminal activities that undermine their mission, their general structure, recruitment, modus operandi and their purpose remain centered in the political rather than the financial returns, making it hard for InSight to say they are simply a criminal enterprise.

Resources

Right-wing scum take over Roma neighborhood



On March 1st, uniformed members of the vigilante group Civil Guard (Szebb Jövőért Polgárőr Egyesület), an offshoot of the dreaded Magyar Garda, took control of a Romani neighbourhood in the village of Gyöngyöspata. They set up two checkpoints at the entrance to the neighbourhood and formed a human chain around the houses of Romani residents. The Civil Guard are supported by the right-wing Jobbik party, and now intend to set up chapters in other towns in Hungary, to expand their patrols.

The European Roma Rights Centre, Amnesty International and Human Rights First sent a letter [PDF] urging Hungarian authorities to intervene and protect the Romani residents of Gyöngyöspata from the intimidation and harassment they have been subjected to by the vigilante organisation, Szebb Jövőért Polgárőr Egyesület (Civil Guard Association for a Better Future), since 1 March. The Szebb Jövőért Polgárőr Egyesület patrols have been supported by the far-right political party Jobbik, which organised a march of thousands through the village in black military uniform on 6 March. According to the ERRC’s monitoring, there were at least 48 attacks against Roma in Hungary between 2008 and 2010, which resulted in at least 9 deaths. The presence of anti-Roma vigilante groups in Roma neighbourhoods adds to growing inter-ethnic tensions and fuels a climate of violence.

The ERRC called for Hungarian authorities to fulfil their domestic and international human rights obligations in Gyöngyöspata, to intervene immediately to ensure the situation does not escalate into physical violence and to protect the Roma from intimidation and harassment.